Goodal

Goodal Cheonggyul Vitamin C Toning Cleansing Balm

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-04

What is this product?

Goodal's Cheonggyul Vitamin C Toning Cleansing Balm takes off makeup and sunscreen because it is an oil balm, not because of the fruit and the vitamin C on the front: Goodal prints 탄제린추출물 at 0.00029ppm, 아스코빅애씨드 at 0.01ppm and 아스코빌글루코사이드 at 0.001ppm, several orders of magnitude under any working dose. What actually matters before you buy this 110ml jar is the scent, because four named aromatic oils and a declared terpene marker sit on its 40-item list together with a small acid group whose amounts are not given (glycolic, lactic, salicylic and capryloyl salicylic), and Goodal publishes no pH either.

What makes it different?

Two things separate it from the rest of the cleansing-balm shelf, and both come out of unusual openness. Goodal publishes exact figures for the two ingredients its marketing is built on, which is why the trace levels above can be stated rather than guessed at. Its own regulatory block also says it passed no functional-cosmetic review, which contradicts the whitening tag a price comparison listing attaches to it, so a shopper reading that listing is being told something the product itself denies.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: Pinus Sylvestris Leaf Oil, Citrus Aurantium Dulcis (Orange) Peel Oil, Citrus Limon (Lemon) Peel Oil, Citrus Grandis Peel Oil, Ethylhexyl Palmitate, Trihydroxystearin, Cetearyl Olivate, Sorbitan Olivate, Salicylic Acid

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 6 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up on their own. They are partly right at best.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

overstated ad line3

  • It contains green tangerine extract (tangerine extract) and vitamin C, so after washing, clear skin care as if you had done a vitamin pack is possible
    Korean original

    청귤 추출물(탄제린 추출물)과 비타민C 성분이 들어있어 세안 후에 마치 비타민 팩을 한 것 같은 맑은 피부 케어가 가능하다

  • The refreshing green tangerine sherbet texture melts softly into the skin and cleanly washes away everything from makeup to blackheads and flakes
    Korean original

    상큼한 청귤 샤벳 제형이 피부에 부드럽게 녹아들어 메이크업부터 블랙헤드, 각질까지 말끔하게 씻어내준다

  • With one-step cleansing power that needs no bothersome double cleansing, clean cleansing is possible by packing just one travel kit without other washing tools
    Korean original

    번거로운 이중세안이 필요 없는 원스텝 세정력으로, 다른 세안 도구 없이 트래블 키트 하나만 챙기면 깔끔한 클렌징이 가능하다

no evidence1

  • The steady seller Green Tangerine Vita C Toning Cleansing Balm
    Korean original

    스테디셀러 청귤 비타C토닝 클렌징 밤

evidence says otherwise1

  • MFDS-notified functional ingredient: helps with brightening
    Korean original

    식약처 고시 기능성 성분 : 미백도움

says nothing1

  • Equipped with both product performance and portability
    Korean original

    제품력과 휴대성을 모두 갖춘

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.

Which articles cover it?

Articles on this site that write about this product.