ARZTIN

ARZTIN Regenerative Schild Ampoule

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of ARZTIN Regenerative Schild Ampoule

Read on 2026-09-08

What is this product?

Reach for this if the appeal is a long multi-active essence and evening use is fine, and skip it if fragrant plant material is a dealbreaker. Niacinamide is fifth and adenosine is twenty eighth, which are the two ingredients Korea notifies for whitening and for wrinkle improvement, and the Olive Young record confirms a functional cosmetic review or report was completed without naming which category. The catch is the middle of the list: bergamot oil at thirty one with limonene and linalool declared separately, against a brand line reading 피부저자극 that carries no test. Ninety seven ingredients in total, and the seven actives named here are spread rather than buried: niacinamide 5, 비피다발효용해물 22, adenosine 28, asiaticoside 38, madecassic acid 39, sh-oligopeptide-1 87 and sodium ascorbyl phosphate 94. No content figure is printed for any of them. No review population and no test data were found for this product in the material read here.

What makes it different?

A 97 item list that carries both of Korea's notified functional actives at positions consistent with a dual filing, paired with a fragrant citrus oil in the middle of the same list that works against the low irritation line printed beside it.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 12 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 베르가모트오일, 폴리솔베이트80, 아르간커넬오일, 양까막까치밥나무씨오일, 해바라기씨오일, 올리브오일, 시어버터, 돌콩오일, 하이드로제네이티드레시틴, 레시틴

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 4 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them holds up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence1

  • Completed the functional cosmetics review (or report) under the Cosmetics Act.
    Korean original

    화장품법에 따른 기능성 화장품 심사(또는 보고)를 필함

partly backed1

  • Dual functional cosmetic (wrinkle improvement + whitening)
    Korean original

    2중 기능성 화장품(주름개선 + 미백)

overstated ad line1

  • With Texture Light tightening energy that awakens the skin's youth, it creates noticeable complexion improvement and smooth skin texture.
    Korean original

    피부의 젊음을 깨우는 결光 타이트닝 에너지로 눈에 띄는 안색 개선과 부드러운 피부결을 만들어 줍니다

no evidence1

  • Low skin irritation
    Korean original

    피부저자극

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines