P.CALM

P.CALM 베리어사이클 토너패드

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-16

What is this product?

A pre-soaked toner pad from 피캄, 60 sheets in 160ml. The 45 item list is almost entirely water phase and contains no fragrance, essential oil or listed colourant. Centella enters six ways: two extracts plus madecassoside, asiaticoside, asiatic acid and madecassic acid as separate purified entries, which means specific molecules are being dosed rather than left to extract variability. Papain twenty seventh handles surface keratin by an enzymatic route rather than an acid one. Ceramide NP and beta-glucan sit at the end of the list and there is no occlusive, so this puts water down without holding it there. The product information table records a passed functional cosmetic review without naming the function; niacinamide is fourth and adenosine eighth. The brand states sebum improved 58.12 percent after one use, keratin 20.83 percent and an irritation index of 0.00, and none of the three carries a testing institution, subject count or duration on the surfaces read for this document. pH and an English ingredient list are absent from those surfaces.

What makes it different?

Splits centella into two extracts plus four purified triterpenes rather than one extract entry, and leaves out fragrance and essential oils entirely, while resting its product story on three two-decimal figures whose test basis is not published alongside them.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

Key ingredient

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 11 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 3 of them hold up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence3

  • Not recommended for children under 3 years old and individuals with hypersensitivity reactions depending on skin.
    Korean original

    3세 이하 어린이 및 피부에 따라 과민 반응이 있으신 분들은 권장드리지 않습니다.

  • Take an appropriate amount of this product and spread evenly on the skin.
    Korean original

    본 품 적당량을 취해 피부에 골고루 펴 바른다.

  • Oil
    Korean original

partly backed1

  • Not included
    Korean original

    불포함

no evidence6

  • Suitable for acne-prone skin
    Korean original

    여드름성 피부 적합

  • After 1 use, sebum 58.12% improvement
    Korean original

    1회 사용 후, 피지 58.12% 개선

  • 4-fold pore (volume, area, depth, texture) improvement
    Korean original

    4중 모공(부피, 면적, 깊이, 결) 개선

  • Dead skin cells 20.83% improvement
    Korean original

    각질 20.83% 개선

  • Irritation index 0.00
    Korean original

    자극지수 0.00

  • All skin types including sensitive skin
    Korean original

    민감성 피부를 포함한 모든 피부

says nothing1

  • Sensitive skin that easily becomes irritated
    Korean original

    쉽게 뒤집어지는 민감성 피부

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.