PibooAll postsIngredients
Englishko

beplain

beplain Mung Bean Pore Clearing LHA Toner

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of beplain Mung Bean Pore Clearing LHA Toner

Read on 2026-09-06

What is this product?

Buy beplain's Mung Bean Pore Clearing LHA Toner for daily pore and sebum upkeep, not for the mung bean on the front: beplain prints the amounts, and they are marker level at 200ppm mung bean extract, 5ppm mung bean seed extract and 0.1ppm mung bean sprout extract in a 265ml, 43 ingredient formula. The exfoliating work belongs to capryloyl salicylic acid at a disclosed 10ppm, plus gluconolactone and the enzyme papain, and beplain publishes no pH and no test of its own behind the pore promise or behind the all skin types line on its label.

What makes it different?

Few toners print any amount at all and beplain prints four, which is the reason to trust it and also the reason to read it carefully: 200ppm mung bean extract, 10ppm capryloyl salicylic acid, 5ppm mung bean seed extract and 0.1ppm mung bean sprout extract. No fragrance ingredient, no essential oil and no denatured alcohol appears across the 43 positions, so it is an easier daily acid toner than most of its neighbours. Two things to weigh against that: the papain enzyme carries no printed amount and is the entry most likely to bother reactive skin, and the twelve peptides sit below every extract on the list, so treat them as decoration rather than as an anti-aging step. beplain states on its own page that this product carries no functional cosmetic notification.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

Key ingredient

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 글리세레스-25피씨에이아이소스테아레이트

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 4 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 2 of them hold up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence2

  • After cleansing, take enough product on a cotton pad and wipe along the skin's texture, or take an appropriate amount and gently spread on the face and neck to allow absorption.
    Korean original

    세안 후, 화장솜에 내용물을 충분히 덜어 피부결을 따라 닦아주거나, 적당량을 덜어 얼굴과 목에 부드럽게 펴 발라 흡수시켜 줍니다.

  • The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety review statement does not apply.
    Korean original

    식품의약품안전처심사 필 문구 해당없음

overstated ad line2

  • Pore confidence, mung bean
    Korean original

    모공자신감, 녹두

  • All skin types
    Korean original

    모든 피부 타입

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.

Which articles cover it?

Articles on this site that write about this product.