sidmool PANTHENOL CICA SOAP

What is this product?

A true soap bar from 시드물 built around a four-part centella group, and the fullest expression of that idea in this brand's bar range. The twenty-item Korean statement opens on 글리세린 rather than 정제수, which is unusual and points at a glycerin-rich cold-process style bar, then runs 라우릴글루코사이드 and four saponified fatty acid salts at positions four through seven, so this is a real soap rather than a syndet bar wearing the word. Two sugars follow, then the actives: 병풀잎수 at ten, 판테놀 at eleven, and 마데카소사이드, 아시아티코사이드, 마데카식애씨드 and 아시아틱애씨드 at twelve through fifteen. Seeing centella leaf water and all four isolated centella actives on one bar label is the distinguishing fact about this product. Three oils close the formula at sixteen through eighteen, then a glycol and a pigment. No fragrance material is declared and no drying alcohol appears. The caution is evidential and specific: the marketing bullet prints 덱스판테놀 1,000ppm and 병풀잎수 5,000ppm, but the ingredient statement prints no level for anything at all, so neither figure can be closed against the label, and the copy's 덱스판테놀 does not match the label's 판테놀.

What makes it different?

The centella depth is the differentiator and it is legible straight off the label. A bar that carries 병풀잎수 as its aqueous phase and then lists 마데카소사이드, 아시아티코사이드, 마데카식애씨드 and 아시아틱애씨드 as four separate entries is buying the isolated actives rather than relying on a whole extract, and it puts all five of them in the middle of a twenty-entry list rather than in the tail. The second distinguishing feature is the opening entry: 글리세린 ahead of 정제수 is a formulation signature rather than a marketing choice, and it is consistent with the 수제비누 framing and with why a plain fatty acid soap here would not feel as stripping as its base suggests. The third is a documentation gap that runs the other way from the usual one. The brand's 알로에 삼백초 비누 prints 3% and 2% on its statement and its 유황 수제비누 prints 황(3,000ppm), while this bar's statement prints nothing at all, yet this is the bar whose marketing copy quotes two ppm figures. That inversion is the single thing a verifier should look at first, and the one a reader should discount.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

• Glycerin
• Water
• Lauryl Glucoside
• Sodium Laurate
• Sodium Myristate
• Sodium Palmitate
• Sodium Stearate
• Sucrose
• Sorbitol
• Centella Asiatica Leaf Water
• Panthenol
• Madecassoside
• Asiaticoside
• Madecassic Acid
• Asiatic Acid
• Olea Europaea (Olive) Fruit Oil
• Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil
• Hydrogenated Camellia Oleifera Seed Oil
• 1,2-Hexanediol
• Titanium Dioxide

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 2 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up on their own. They are partly right at best.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines