PibooAll postsIngredients
Englishko

Round Lab

Round Lab Pine Calming Cica Nose Pack

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of Round Lab Pine Calming Cica Nose Pack

Read on 2026-09-12

What is this product?

A two step Korean nose patch, 4 ml per sheet across five uses of each step, with ten cotton swabs in the box. What separates it from a peel off strip is that it is chemistry plus a manual lift rather than adhesion: step 1 carries capryloyl salicylic acid and gluconolactone to soften sebum over 10 to 15 minutes, the user clears it with the enclosed swab, and step 2 goes back on with niacinamide, panthenol and three hyaluronate forms to settle the area. It is also unusually transparent about strength: pine leaf extract is printed at 1,052 ppm in step 1 and 1,047 ppm in step 2, and the centella block that carries the 시카 in the name is printed at 0.0105 ppm, which is parts per billion. Reasons to skip it: lavender oil and lavender extract both sit in step 1, the protocol adds a mechanical pass over freshly acid treated skin, and the statutory functional filing line names no axis so there is nothing to check it against.

What makes it different?

Two separate formulas in one box with a swab step between them, and a label that prints concentrations down to 0.0105 ppm, which lets a reader see exactly how much of the 시카 in the product name is actually there.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 3 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredient

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: Lavandula Angustifolia (Lavender) Oil, Polyglyceryl-10 Oleate, Hydrogenated Lecithin, Octyldodeceth-16

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 5 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 2 of them hold up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence2

  • [Blackhead/Clogged Pores]
    Korean original

    [블랙헤드/피지모공]

  • 1) After cleansing, remove moisture, then attach it firmly to areas with blackhead and sebum concerns. 2) After 10~15 minutes, remove the sheet, then gently remove the softened blackheads and sebum using the included cotton swab. 3) After removing blackheads and sebum, attach a sheet to the area as needed, then remove it after 10~20 minutes. 4) Gently tap the remaining contents on the skin to absorb.
    Korean original

    1) 세안 후 물기를 제거한 뒤 블랙헤드와 피지가 고민인 부위에 잘 밀착시켜 붙여줍니다. 2) 10~15분 후 시트를 떼어낸 후 불려진 블랙헤드와 피지를 동봉된 면봉을 이용하여 부드럽게 제거해 줍니다. 3) 블랙헤드와 피지를 제거한 부위에 맞게 시트를 부착한 뒤 10~20분 후 떼어내줍니다. 4) 피부에 남은 내용물은 가볍게 두드려 흡수시켜 줍니다.

partly backed2

  • Completed functional cosmetics review (or reporting) under the Cosmetics Act.
    Korean original

    화장품법에 따른 기능성 화장품 심사(또는 보고)를 필함

  • Pine Soothing Cica
    Korean original

    소나무 진정 시카

overstated ad line1

  • For all skin types.
    Korean original

    모든 피부용

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.