PibooAll postsIngredients
Englishko

DEWYTREE

DEWYTREE AC 컨트롤 딥 그린 카밍 클레이젤 모공팩

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-14

What is this product?

듀이트리 AC 컨트롤 딥 그린 카밍 클레이젤 모공팩 is a 100ml Korean wash-off clay gel treatment, rinsed after five to ten minutes. Its disclosure runs to 64 entries and is the substance of what is known about it: six clays at positions 4, 37, 39, 40, 42 and 44, two proteolytic enzymes with papain at 43 and bromelain at 46, capryloyl salicylic acid at 38 and lactobionic acid at 45 as the exfoliating acids, four plant oils at 33 to 36 that keep the film from setting hard, and eighteen consecutive botanical extracts from position 12 to 29. The brand files 해당 없음 for functional-cosmetic status, so this is not a notified acne-relief product despite the AC line name. No concentration is disclosed for any of the 64 entries, no pH is published, no INCI list appears, and no human test of any kind is cited. Peppermint oil, peppermint leaf extract and corn mint powder are the declared scent sources. No ranking snapshot carries this product, so review figures are null for snapshot absence.

What makes it different?

A clay treatment built as a humectant-heavy gel with four plant oils so it does not set and crack, carrying both enzyme and acid exfoliation, and sold by a brand that declines the acne-relief functional registration its own line name implies.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 5 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 페퍼민트오일, 올리브오일, 퀸즈랜드넛오일, 포도씨오일, 호호바씨오일, 하이드로제네이티드레시틴, 수크로오스팔미테이트

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 7 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 3 of them hold up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

backed by evidence3

  • 화장품법에 따른 기능성 화장품(미백, 주름개선, 자외선차단제품 등)의 경우: 해당 없음
  • 5~10분 후 미온수로 깨끗이 씻어냅니다.
  • 햇빛에 대한 피부의 감수성을 증가시킬수 있으므로 자외선 차단제를 함께 사용할것.

likely, not proven1

  • 사용기한 또는 개봉 후 사용기간: 개봉 후 12개월

partly backed1

  • 살리실릭애씨드 및 그 염류를 함유하고 있으므로 3세이하 어린이에게는 사용하지 말것.

overstated ad line1

  • 마르지 않는 촉촉한 클레이젤! #모공 순삭

no evidence1

  • 제품 주요사양: 모든 피부 타입

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.