PibooAll postsIngredients
Englishko

DEWYTREE

DEWYTREE AC Deep Soothing Pore Pad

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of DEWYTREE AC Deep Soothing Pore Pad

Read on 2026-09-11

What is this product?

A 46-ingredient soothing pad whose cooling agents are declared on the label rather than left to be inferred. Three sensates sit consecutively at positions 24 to 26, 멘틸락테이트, 에틸멘탄카복사마이드 and 메틸다이아이소프로필프로피온아마이드, with 페퍼민트오일 at 19 and no free menthol, which is the combination formulators pick for long cooling on skin that is already irritated. The soothing axis is conventional and placed high: 알로에베라잎즙 at 9, 알란토인 at 10, 병풀추출물 at 12. The essence carries no acid exfoliant at all, screened at zero across eight acid classes, so despite the peeling-pad filing this wipes mechanically rather than exfoliating chemically; 파파인 at 46 is the only proteolytic entry and it is last. No fragrance and no alcohol. The pad is two-sided, a green microfiber face and a cotton face, described in the usage tips of one surface only, the Olive Young corpus record. Nothing is quantified: no pH, no test, no subject count and no institution anywhere, which is why the cooling claim's suitability-for-irritated-skin half is graded short rather than granted.

What makes it different?

Two separators, and the first is a mismatch between the shelf and the formula. This product is filed under peeling pads and ranks in that board, but a token screen for eight acid classes returns nothing across all 46 entries: no glycolic, lactic, salicylic, mandelic, gluconolactone, lactobionic, betaine salicylate or capryloyl salicylic acid. The only exfoliating entry of any kind is 파파인 at the final position, a protease at trace placement. So a reader who arrives here expecting a chemical exfoliant is in the wrong place; what this does is wipe mechanically with a microfiber face while delivering a soothing and cooling essence. The second separator is that the cooling is honest. A 쿨링 claim can rest on nothing more than evaporation from a water base, which no label can distinguish; this one instead declares three named sensates in consecutive label positions and deliberately omits free menthol, so the cooling half of that claim can be checked against the label and it holds. The half the label cannot settle sits in the same sentence: fitness for skin that is already irritated, for which no test of any kind is published. The trade-off a reader should weigh is the same stack: three sensates plus peppermint oil is a meaningful sensory load for skin that is genuinely reactive, and the brand publishes no irritation test to bound it.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 3 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 페퍼민트오일, 카프릴릭/카프릭트라이글리세라이드, 폴리솔베이트60, 락토바실러스/배즙발효여과물, 락토바실러스/석류발효추출물, 락토바실러스/콩발효추출물, 효모/보리씨발효여과물

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them holds up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

backed by evidence1

  • 스킨케어 첫 단계에서 초록 극세사 면으로 피부를 부드럽게 닦아 냅니다.

partly backed2

  • 진정에 진정을 더한 AC 쌈무 패드!
  • 자극받은 피부를 위한 쿨링 진정 패드

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines