SHIONLE

SHIONLE Laminaria Ampoule Cleansing Foam

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of SHIONLE Laminaria Ampoule Cleansing Foam

Read on 2026-09-03

What is this product?

SHIONLE's Laminaria Ampoule Cleansing Foam is a 120ml potassium-soap wash: good for oily, sebum-heavy skin that tolerates an alkaline cleanser, wrong for dry, barrier-impaired, fragrance-avoiding or reactive skin, which should take a low-pH cleanser instead. Its kelp is disclosed twice and unusually precisely, juice at 10 percent in position 3 of 35 and powder at 1 percent in position 12, which also tells you everything past position 12 sits at or under roughly 1 percent, including the salicylic acid at 20, the declared fragrance at 18 and all eight hyaluronates; the brand publishes no pH.

What makes it different?

Two disclosed kelp amounts on one label, 10 percent juice at position 3 and 1 percent powder at position 12, hand you a usable 1 percent ceiling for the whole back two thirds of the list, which is more than most cleansers let you work out. The other oddity is an eight-species hyaluronate tail on a wash you rinse straight off, of which exactly one, hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate, is cationic and actually deposits, joined by polyquaternium-7, a cationic conditioning polymer that is not a hyaluronate at all; those two together are why it feels slippery after rinsing.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: Myristic Acid, Palmitic Acid, Stearic Acid, Lauric Acid, Arachidic Acid, Glyceryl Stearate, Sorbitan Olivate, Salicylic Acid

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 6 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them holds up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence1

  • #KelpFoam
    Korean original

    #다시마폼

likely, not proven1

  • #HighDensityFoam
    Korean original

    #고밀도거품

partly backed1

  • With exfoliating ingredients added
    Korean original

    각질제거 성분을 더해

overstated ad line2

  • #SebumAdsorption
    Korean original

    #피지흡착

  • Cleanly removes sebum and flakes
    Korean original

    피지, 각질 말끔히 제거

says nothing1

  • The natural beauty brand, Shunly
    Korean original

    내추럴 뷰티 브랜드, 션리

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.

Which articles cover it?

Articles on this site that write about this product.