PibooAll postsIngredients
Englishko

Round Lab

Round Lab 1025 Dokdo Cleansing Tissue

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of Round Lab 1025 Dokdo Cleansing Tissue

Read on 2026-09-05

What is this product?

Round Lab's 1025 Dokdo Cleansing Tissue is a genuinely unscented water-type wipe for light makeup away from a sink, sold as a 30-sheet tub and as a three-pack bundle. Its 24 ingredients read like a hydrating essence that happens to cleanse: 정제수 first, two glycols, a polyglyceryl solubiliser at 4, 해수 at 5, three hyaluronic acid forms at 6 through 8, then 알란토인, 판테놀, a protease and a second polyglyceryl solubiliser, with no oil, no wax, no fragrance material and no denatured alcohol among the 24. The 178g net weight on the pack comes off retailer listings rather than Round Lab's own mall.

What makes it different?

Three things separate it on the wipe shelf. First, the humectants are real and front-loaded, 해수 and three distinct hyaluronic acid forms at positions 5 through 8, ahead of the second surfactant, a stronger hydrating build than most water-type wipes carry. Second, it is unscented by the label rather than by marketing wording, rare enough here to work as a screening criterion on its own, though 소듐메타바이설파이트 at 13 is a sulfite worth knowing about first, and the protease at 14 is an enzyme almost no rival wipe includes. Third, a retailer cites a 한국피부과학연구원 study placing it in a low-irritation group without printing a panel size or a date, and Round Lab publishes nothing about the product on its own pages, so everything here comes off retailer listings.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 7 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them holds up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence1

  • It is a fragrance free product with no added fragrance.
    Korean original

    향료를 첨가하지 않은 무향 제품이에요.

partly backed5

  • A fresh and moist water-type cleansing tissue
    Korean original

    산뜻 촉촉한 워터 타입 클렌징 티슈

  • The cleansing water soaked into the thick embossed sheet cleanly wipes away makeup and skin impurities.
    Korean original

    도톰한 엠보 시트에 적셔진 클렌징 워터가 메이크업과 피부 노폐물을 말끔하게 닦아줍니다.

  • Ulleungdo deep sea water and triple hyaluronic acid leave moistness on the skin even after wiping.
    Korean original

    울릉도 해양 심층수와 3중 히알루론산은 닦아낸 후에도 피부에 촉촉함을 남겨주죠.

  • Unlike oil-type tissues that leave a slippery residue, you will also like how it finishes fresh with a water base.
    Korean original

    미끌거리는 잔여감이 남는 오일 타입 티슈와 다르게, 워터 베이스로 산뜻하게 마무리되는 점도 마음에 들 거예요.

  • Testing institution : Korea Institute of Dermatological Science / Test result : in a human application study on primary skin irritation evaluation, judged to belong to the low irritation product group
    Korean original

    시험 기관 : 한국피부과학연구원 / 시험 결과 : 피부 일차 자극 평가에 대한 인체적용시험 결과, 저자극 제품군에 속하는 것으로 판단

overstated ad line1

  • The sheet is thick and large, so even one sheet cleanly removes makeup and skin impurities. After wiping it finishes fresh yet moist, with no slipperiness or residue.
    Korean original

    시트가 도톰하고 커서 한 장으로도 메이크업과 피부 노폐물을 말끔하게 지워줘요. 닦아낸 후에는 미끌거리거나 잔여감 없이 산뜻하면서도 촉촉하게 마무리돼요.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.

Which articles cover it?

Articles on this site that write about this product.