FATION

FATION NOSCA9 Trouble Mark Repair Cream

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of FATION NOSCA9 Trouble Mark Repair Cream

Read on 2026-09-06

What is this product?

FATION's NOSCA9 Trouble Mark Repair Cream is the sealing step for skin working on breakout marks, not a barrier cream: 70ml with Niacinamide ninth of 68 ingredients, Tranexamic Acid thirteenth and Alpha-Arbutin behind them, plus Panthenol, Allantoin and Bisabolol for the calming half. Do not read the list opening as a plant-extract product, because sea buckthorn and mugwort lead it only because purified water is added separately in eighteenth place, and FATION prints no amount for anything. Retinyl Palmitate closes the list, so skip it while pregnant or nursing.

What makes it different?

The ingredient order is the most distinctive thing on this label: purified water sits eighteenth behind sea buckthorn fruit and mugwort leaf extract, which looks like a botanical-first formula and in practice means the extracts arrived pre-dissolved. Behind that the cream is a genuinely mixed brief, carrying pigment actives and a soothing set in one product where most mark creams pick one. It has no fragrance, no essential oil and no drying alcohol across all 68 ingredients, but it also carries more than a dozen botanical extracts, which is the usual source of surprise reactions, and no irritation test for this cream appears on the pages held here to check that against, although those same pages do carry one for a sibling cleanser.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 3 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredient

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: Squalane, Polyglyceryl-10 Laurate, Polyglyceryl-10 Stearate, Diisostearyl Malate, Jojoba Esters, Retinyl Palmitate

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked the one line this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up. There is nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

says nothing1

  • A. If any abnormal symptoms or side effects such as red spots, swelling, or itching occur on the area of use due to direct sunlight during or after use of the cosmetic, consult a specialist, etc.
    Korean original

    가. 화장품 사용 시 또는 사용 후 직사광선에 의하여 사용부위가 붉은 반점, 부어오름 또는 가려움증 등의 이상 증상이나 부작용이 있는 경우에는 전문의 등과 상담할 것

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.