May Young
May Young Pore Repair Spicule Peeling Ampoule
Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read
Read on 2026-09-22
What is this product?
A silica-based spicule peeling ampoule for pore texture, backed by salicylic acid, niacinamide, and a ferment filtrate placed in the mid-to-late half of the list. Best for oily or combination skin wanting gentle physical plus chemical exfoliation; those avoiding fragrance should note it is included.
What makes it different?
Silica is the only printed concentration (1980ppm), confirming a real physical polishing phase rather than a marketing-only spicule story. The soothing and barrier tail is unusually full for a peeling product, with Centella extract, Ceramide NP, Glycosphingolipids, and Madecassoside all sitting from item 23 to item 30 near the end. Salicylic acid sits at item 21 and niacinamide at item 19, so the chemical-actives doses are likely modest. No drying alcohol is listed, which softens the irritation profile.
What is in it?
The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.
This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 1 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.
Key ingredientWorth a closer look
- Water
- Glycerin
- 쿼터늄-60
- Propylene Glycol
- 1,2-Hexanediol
- Dipropylene Glycol
- Carbomer
- Polyglyceryl-10 Myristate
- Diphenyl Dimethicone
- Polyglyceryl-10 Laurate
- Triethylhexanoin
- Silica
- Galactomyces Ferment Filtrate
- Hydrogenated Lecithin
- Ethylhexylglycerin
- Polyglyceryl-10 Oleate
- Fragrance
- Disodium EDTA
- Niacinamide
- Citric Acid
- Salicylic Acid
- Butylene Glycol
- Centella Asiatica Extract
- Pinus Palustris Leaf Extract
- Ulmus Davidiana Root Extract
- Oenothera Biennis (Evening Primrose) Flower Extract
- Pueraria Lobata Root Extract
- Ceramide NP
- Glycosphingolipids
- Madecassoside
Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.
We could not place these in the list above: 폴리글리세릴-10미리스테이트, 폴리글리세릴-10라우레이트, 다이페닐다이메티콘
Did the ad claims hold up?
We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up. There is nothing behind them.
Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.
no evidence1
- '72 hours' shining pore texture-glow care
Korean original
'72시간' 빛나는 모공 결광케어
says nothing2
- #NewConcept PoreCare #TextureGlowBooster #SpiculePeelingAmpoule #GommagePeelingAmpoule
Korean original
#신개념 모공케어 #결광부스터 #스피큘필링앰플 #고마쥬필링앰플
- [35%] pore repair spicule peeling ampoule 50ml, peeling ampoule,peeling,ampoule,spicule,pore,repair,72 hours,texture-glow care, Meiyeong, All
Korean original
[35%] 모공 리페어 스피큘 필링 앰플 50ml, 필링앰플,필링,앰플,스피큘,모공,리페어,72시간,결광케어, 메이영, All
Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.