Dermatory

Dermatory 시카 피디알엔 흔적 진정 패드

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-30

What is this product?

A Korean cooling and calming gauze toner pad from Dermatory, sold on the brand owner's storefront as a set of a 70 pad jar and a 70 pad refill, with a soothing face and a gauze face. The 32 printed entries lead with water, dipropylene glycol, glycerin and niacinamide, print a centella leaf extract at 500.1ppm in ninth place, list sodium DNA (PDRN) at 21 and four centella marker compounds at ppm level. There is no fragrance entry, no essential oil, no drying alcohol and no exfoliating acid; the two acid named entries are centella compounds at trace level. The statutory row files it as a whitening functional cosmetic. The brand prints a minus 7.1 degree cooling figure from one 21 person single use test, a marks care headline with no result values on the images read, and an adhesion chart whose final frame labels a 32.89 percent improvement over the brand's own earlier pad. No pH is published. No lived use reports were collected.

What makes it different?

The disclosed centella leaf extract at 500.1ppm and the trace level marker compounds, together with niacinamide at 4 and PDRN at 21, on a list with no fragrance, no exfoliating acid (the two acid named entries at 27 and 29 are centella compounds at ppm level) and no essential oil. The pad is two faced, a soothing face and a gauze face, and the brand sells it on a one use cooling figure. The trade-offs sit on the same page: the marks headline has no printed result values on the images read, the exosome wording resolves to four ordinary entries by the brand's own footnote, and the adhesion headline is measured only against the brand's own earlier pad.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 1 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 15 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. Here is how they read: backed by evidence: 1 · partly backed: 5 · overstated ad line: 1 · no source confirms it: 7 · says nothing: 1.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence1

  • Whitening functional
    Korean original

    미백 기능성

partly backed5

  • -7.1℃ cooling*
    Korean original

    -7.1℃ 쿨링*

  • #HeatCooling #Trace**Soothing
    Korean original

    #열감쿨링 #흔적**진정

  • Improved adherence compared to existing Cica gauze pad*!
    Korean original

    기존 시카 거즈패드* 대비 더 좋아진 밀착력!

  • Heated skin temperature -7.1℃ heat soothing effect
    Korean original

    열받은 피부 온도 -7.1℃ 열감진정효과

  • 13.3% skin soothing (caused by heat stimulation)
    Korean original

    13.3% 피부 진정(열 자극에 의한)

overstated ad line1

  • Cica exosome + PDRN trace soothing pad
    Korean original

    시카엑소좀 + PDRN 흔적 진정 패드

no source confirms it7

  • Trace** soothing pad
    Korean original

    흔적** 진정패드

  • Improves even skin tone & texture & blemishes after 2 weeks
    Korean original

    2주 후 피부 톤&결&잡티 까지 개선

  • Sticks perfectly without slipping!
    Korean original

    미끄러짐 없이 착붙!

  • Moist gelling fabric blocks moisture evaporation and adheres closely to skin curves, moisture evaporation DOWN
    Korean original

    촉촉한 겔링 원단이 수분 증발을 막고 피부 굴곡에 그대로 밀착되어 수분 증발 DOWN

  • 100% skin soothing satisfaction
    Korean original

    100% 피부 진정 만족도

  • 95% trace* improvement satisfaction
    Korean original

    95% 흔적* 개선 만족도

  • 100% immediate moisture sensation
    Korean original

    100% 즉각적인 수분감

says nothing1

  • Stick on to care for traces*
    Korean original

    붙여서 흔적* 케어

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.