Celladix

Celladix Trouble Sebum Rebalancing 131 Ampoule

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of Celladix Trouble Sebum Rebalancing 131 Ampoule

Read on 2026-09-09

What is this product?

Celladix Trouble Sebum Rebalancing 131 Ampoule is a water-based blemish and sebum treatment, and the reason to use it is a barrier story the brand undersells: Ceramide NP, Phytosterols and Squalane sit together at positions 8 to 10 alongside Niacinamide at position 5, which puts real barrier-lipid material in the front half of a sebum formula. Reviewers report the blemish outcome more often than the sebum one. The reasons to avoid it are specific. Six essential oils sit at positions 35 to 40 and the list closes with declared Limonene and Linalool, with no antioxidant anywhere on the 42 entries to slow their oxidation. Two of those oils are citrus peel oils, so nighttime use plus daytime sun protection is the conservative reading. Three fatty acids and two polyglyceryl esters in the front half make it a poor match for Malassezia-driven blemishes specifically. Both headline percentages, 107.05 and 87.61, arrive with no institution, participant count or design, and the storefront and the Olive Young record agree that this is not a filed functional cosmetic.

What makes it different?

A sebum-and-blemish ampoule that quietly carries three stratum corneum lipid analogues in its front half, paired with an aromatic tail of six essential oils and two declared allergens and no antioxidant to protect them; both of its headline efficacy percentages arrive with no test description at all.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 7 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up on their own. They are partly right at best.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

overstated ad line2

  • Skin sebum improvement 107.05%
    Korean original

    피부 피지 개선 107.05%

  • Skin barrier function improvement 87.61%
    Korean original

    피부 장벽 기능 개선 87.61%

no evidence4

  • Human trial completed for suitability for acne-prone skin
    Korean original

    여드름성 피부 적합 인체 시험 완료

  • Non-irritation human trial completed
    Korean original

    비자극 인체 시험 완료

  • #1RepurchaseRate #SebumSoftening #PoreBarrier
    Korean original

    #재구매율1위 #피지연화 #모공장벽

  • This product is a highly concentrated ampoule that is suitable for acne-prone skin.

says nothing1

  • Sebum care for problem-prone skin
    Korean original

    문제성피부를 위한 피지 케어

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.