sidmool
sidmool ACBYE ENZYME POWDER CLEANSER
Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read
Read on 2026-09-09
What is this product?
An anhydrous enzyme powder cleanser from 시드물, sold in a 60g tub, and the one product in this document whose active is quantified and whose mechanism is a wash-time enzyme rather than a leave-on ingredient. The twenty-item Korean statement opens on 옥수수전분 and 만니톨, the powder base, then two surfactants at positions three and four, 소듐코코일이세티오네이트 and 소듐라우로일글루타메이트, which are the gentle end of the surfactant range and the only cleansing agents on the list: no soap, no sulfate and no water anywhere. 다이글리세린 and 말토덱스트린 follow, then a green tea and chlorella block at seven through nine including 에피갈로카테킨갈레이트, chamomile extract at ten, 솔비톨 at eleven, and the active 파파인 at twelve with a printed 0.3%. 알란토인, 셀룰로오스검, 황금추출물, 시트릭애씨드 and four more botanical extracts close it. No fragrance material is declared and no drying alcohol appears. The caution is one specific claim: the page says the product shortens the skin's turnover cycle, which is a physiological assertion with no test behind it anywhere in this collection.
What makes it different?
Three things separate this powder from the enzyme washes a reader is likely to be weighing it against. First, the enzyme is quantified: 파파인(0.3%) printed on the ingredient statement rather than left to ordinal position, which matters because an enzyme cleanser's whole proposition is the enzyme and most of the decision turns on how much of it there is. Third, the botanical load is unusually broad for an anhydrous format, running green tea powder, chlorella powder, an isolated catechin, chamomile, scutellaria, green tea extract, mugwort, houttuynia and yuzu across the middle and tail of a twenty-entry list. Against those, one claim on the page overreaches badly and is worth discounting entirely: the turnover-cycle line asserts a physiological rate change that nothing in this collection tests.
What is in it?
The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.
Key ingredientWorth a closer look
- Zea Mays (Corn) Starch
- Mannitol
- Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate
- Sodium Lauroyl Glutamate
- Diglycerin
- Maltodextrin
- Camellia Sinensis Leaf Powder
- Chlorella Vulgaris Powder
- Epigallocatechin Gallate
- Chamomilla Recutita (Matricaria) Flower/Leaf Extract
- Sorbitol
- Papain
- Allantoin
- Cellulose Gum
- Scutellaria Baicalensis Root Extract
- Citric Acid
- Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
- Artemisia Vulgaris Extract
- Houttuynia Cordata Extract
- Citrus Junos Fruit Extract
Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.
Did the ad claims hold up?
We checked 6 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 2 of them look likely, though none are proven outright.
Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.
likely, not proven2
- A type that is not too dry after cleansing
Korean original
클렌징 후 너무 건조하지 않은 타입
- Granule type that dissolves well in water and is convenient to use
Korean original
물에 잘 녹고 사용하기 편리한 과립 타입
partly backed2
- Granule-type mild exfoliating cleanser for problem skin
Korean original
과립타입의 마일드 각질 문제성 피부 클렌져
- Healthy cleansing with plant-derived ingredients
Korean original
식물유래 성분들로 건강 클렌징
no evidence2
- Shortening the turnover cycle for healthier skin
Korean original
턴 오버주기를 단축하여 더욱 건강한 피부로
- Sensitive skin
Korean original
민감성 피부
Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.
Which articles cover it?
Articles on this site that write about this product.