sidmool

sidmool ULTRA FACIAL MOISTURIZING SUN STICK

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-14

What is this product?

A Korean mineral sunscreen stick from sidmool, 15g per stick, sold only as a one plus one pair. The list runs 42 entries and is anhydrous until position 36. Titanium dioxide at position 5 is the only notified UV filter present, which supports the brand's mineral only positioning; benzotriazolyl dodecyl p-cresol at 6 also absorbs UV but as a formulation protectant rather than a notified active, and both facts are recorded without resolving the label wording. The brand's five hyaluronate claim was checked by enumeration and is exact: five forms at positions 14 to 18. Five gelling and structurant entries hold the ester blend in stick form without wax, and two absorbent powders point at a matte finish. What the page does not carry is the problem. SPF50+ and PA++++ appear on the brand's own title and copy and nowhere else: the statutory disclosure block is an empty shell, so there is no functional cosmetic notation, no test, no filter amount, no application dose, no reapplication interval and no water resistance grade.

What makes it different?

Three things are worth carrying away. First, a claim that checks out exactly: five hyaluronate forms are advertised and five are declared, at positions 14 through 18, with no sixth anywhere. Second, the filter picture is cleaner than the label wording alone would tell you, since titanium dioxide is the only notified UV filter in 42 entries while a second UV absorbing entry sits at position 6 in a protectant role. Third, and against both, a disclosure hole that matters more on a sunscreen than on any other form: the page's statutory block is empty, so a product claiming SPF50+ and PA++++ ships with no notation, no test, no application amount, no reapplication interval and no water resistance grade on the page that sells it.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 5 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 2 of them look likely, though none are proven outright.

likely, not proven2

  • 언제 어디서든 간편한 관리를 위한 포켓 사이즈 스틱 타입!
  • 깔끔하고 끈적이지 않는 사용감으로 햇빛, 자외선으로 부터 피부 관리에 도움!

partly backed2

  • 촉촉하고 산뜻한 무기차자 100, 강력한 자외선 차단제 / SPF50+ PA++++
  • 히알루론산 5종을 담아 촉촉한 수분 관리, 진정, 자외선 차단 관리를 동시에!

overstated ad line1

  • 피부 고민을 해결해 드리기 위한 천연 기능성 더마 화장품입니다.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.