Aestura Atobarrier 365 Hydro Soothing Cream

What is this product?

A 35-ingredient barrier cream in the 80 ml size, and the panel is a conventional ceramide emulsion rather than the amino-acid formula the brand's other Atobarrier creams use. 세라마이드엔피 sits at position 22 with 콜레스테롤 at 27 and free fatty acids around them, which is the classical barrier triad, plus 스핑고리피드 and a pseudo-ceramide. There is no fragrance, no alcohol and no acid exfoliant anywhere in it. The brand's disclosure is unusually rich and unusually uneven: one human trial is printed with an exact date window, an age band and 30 subjects, but its endpoints are all self-reported impressions, while the physical figures the same page quotes (a 5.5 degree surface-temperature drop, four pore metrics to two decimals, a 55 percent sebum reduction) carry no method at all and, in the cooling case, no supporting ingredient, since the panel contains no cooling agent by token screen. Two reading cautions bound this record. The brand sells a 60 ML size under the same product name with a completely different formula, and the brand's own product page for this size renders nothing, so the operative first-party surface is the corporate mall.

What makes it different?

The separator is a warning, not a feature, and it is the most decision-relevant fact in this record: 아토베리어365 하이드로 수딩크림 is two different products. The 80 ml that this stub is keyed to is a ceramide-and-cholesterol barrier emulsion. The 60 ML sold under the identical name is an amino-acid and trehalose formula that shares almost nothing with it, carrying no 세라마이드엔피, no 스핑고리피드, no 베타-글루칸 and no 징크클로라이드, while the 80 ml carries no trehalose, no PCA and no amino acid at all. The second separator is evidential rather than compositional. Within one page the brand publishes a dated human trial with a stated subject count and, a sentence later, four pore metrics to two decimal places with no method, which makes this a useful case for reading Korean cosmetic copy: the qualifiers in parentheses (in-vitro, ex vivo, 원료적 특성, 일시적 효과, 개인차 있음) are where the brand marks its own evidence grade, and here they are accurate.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

• Water
• Glycerin
• Butylene Glycol
• Dimethicone
• Squalane
• 1,2-Hexanediol
• Betaine
• Cetearyl Alcohol
• Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP Copolymer
• Hydrogenated Rice Bran Oil
• Hydrogenated Lecithin
• Polyglyceryl-3 Methylglucose Distearate
• Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6
• Mannitol
• Cetyl-PG Hydroxyethyl Palmitamide
• Stearic Acid
• Ethylhexylglycerin
• Glyceryl Caprylate
• Propanediol
• Glyceryl Stearate
• Sodium Metaphosphate
• Ceramide NP
• Carbomer
• Palmitic Acid
• Silica
• Zinc Chloride
• Cholesterol
• Beta-Glucan
• Sphingolipids
• Sodium Hyaluronate
• Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
• Myristic Acid
• Propylene Glycol
• Lauric Acid
• Tocopherol

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 하이드로제네이티드레시틴, 폴리글리세릴-3메틸글루코오스다이스테아레이트, 글리세릴스테아레이트, 글리세릴카프릴레이트, 하이드로제네이티드쌀겨오일, 미리스틱애씨드, 라우릭애씨드

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 7 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 2 of them look likely, though none are proven outright.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines