PibooAll postsIngredients
Englishko

ESTHETIC HOUSE

ESTHETIC HOUSE 콜라겐 허브 콤플렉스 로션

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-15

What is this product?

A 1000ml oil-in-water face lotion from 에스테틱하우스, built on an emulsifier and fatty-alcohol base with olive oil and shea in the first fifteen entries, so it is emollient-led rather than humectant-led. The 45-entry Korean list prints one concentration, 콜라겐수 at 10,000 ppm (1.0 percent) in position eight, and carries 아데노신 at twenty-three, a fifteen-extract botanical block from twenty-six to forty, and five declared fragrance entries closing the list, four of them labelled allergens. Sold in a single size with no volume variant among the eight listings the brand's own collagen search returns. No usage instruction, no pH and no functional-cosmetic registration row appears on any of the three brand pages archived for this document, though the package itself was not examined.

What makes it different?

Two things stand out. It prints a concentration for its headline material, which lotions at this size usually do not, and it carries a fifteen-extract botanical run that is the only visible basis for the 허브 콤플렉스 in its name. The third is an absence rather than a feature: on the three brand pages read for this document there is no usage instruction at all, not even a statutory row for one, so how much to use and when is left to whatever the package prints.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 11 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 글리세릴스테아레이트, 피이지-100스테아레이트, 솔비탄세스퀴올리에이트, 스테아릭애씨드, 올리브오일, 시어버터, 세테아릴알코올

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 5 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 3 of them look likely, though none are proven outright.

likely, not proven3

  • 1) 화장품 사용 시 또는 사용 후 직사광선에 의하여 사용부위가 붉은 반점, 부어오름 또는 가려움증 등의 이상 증상이나 부작용이 있는 경우 전문의 등과 상담할 것
  • 2) 상처가 있는 부위 등에는 사용을 자제할 것
  • 3) 보관 및 취급 시의 주의사항

partly backed1

  • 콜라겐수(10,000ppm)

no evidence1

  • 모든 피부 타입

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.