PibooAll postsIngredients

beplain

beplain Mung Bean Milk Peeling Gel

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-16

What is this product?

A 120ml rub off peeling gel from beplain built on mung bean and soy, used on damp or dry skin after cleansing and rinsed off. The Korean statutory disclosure runs 36 entries, and the exfoliation is a hybrid: cotton powder at position 3 does the physical work, with gluconolactone and capryloyl salicylic acid in the tail adding a mild chemical route. Mung bean extract is disclosed at 4,011ppm and a soy milk ferment filtrate at 1,000ppb. No fragrance entry and no alcohol appear in the list, and it is not filed as a functional cosmetic. The irritation evidence is unusually well documented for the price position: a printed report from a named clinical centre, 30 or more subjects, a 24 hour occlusive patch, an irritation index of 0.02 and a non irritating verdict. The performance figures on the same page, 100 percent satisfaction and 184 percent makeup adhesion improvement, name no panel or instrument.

What makes it different?

It prints an actual irritation report rather than a badge: named centre, confirmation number, panel floor, 24 hour occlusive patch protocol and an index of 0.02. It also discloses a level for its headline botanical, mung bean extract at 4,011ppm, rather than leaving it unstated.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 2 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredient

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 카프릴릭/카프릭트라이글리세라이드, 폴리글리세릴-10라우레이트, 하이드로제네이티드레시틴

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 15 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 5 of them hold up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

backed by evidence5

  • OK on dry face or wet face
    Korean original

    마른 얼굴에든 젖은 얼굴에든 OK

  • Clinically completed low-irritation safe peeling
    Korean original

    임상을 완료한 저자극 안심필링

  • No need to towel-dry, convenient on both dry and wet skin
    Korean original

    수건으로 물기 닦을 필요없이 마른 피부 젖은 피부에 모두 간편하게

  • After cleansing, apply evenly and gently to the entire face excluding the eye and mouth areas, on wet skin or on moisture-free skin.
    Korean original

    세안 후 젖은 상태 또는 물기가 없는 상태에서 눈가와 입가를 제외한 얼굴 전체에 부드럽게 펴 발라 줍니다.

  • Not applicable
    Korean original

    해당없음

likely, not proven1

  • Skin makeup adhesion improvement without caking & lifting
    Korean original

    끼임&들뜸 없는 피부 메이크업 밀착력 개선

partly backed4

  • #MungBeanSoyMilkPeeling #LowIrritation #Moisturizing All-in-one mung bean milk peeling gel
    Korean original

    #녹두두유필링 #저자극 #촉촉 다 되는 녹두 밀크 필링 젤

  • Result of summing positive scale responses from survey evaluation after single use of test product at True Skin Clinical Trial Center
    Korean original

    트루 피부 임상시험센터 시험제품 1회 사용 후 설문 평가 결과 중 긍정 척도 합산 결과

  • Improvement rate of test group relative to control group 100% baseline
    Korean original

    대조군 100% 기준 대비 시험군 개선율

  • Product completed skin irritation testing, so you can use it with confidence
    Korean original

    피부 자극 테스트를 완료한 제품으로 안심하고 사용 가능합니다

overstated ad line2

  • Moist low-irritation peeling with mung bean soy milk polymer
    Korean original

    녹두 두유 폴리머로 촉촉한 저자극 필링

  • Mung bean peeling to enjoy before and after cleansing
    Korean original

    세안 전후 즐기는 녹두필링

no evidence3

  • User satisfaction 100%
    Korean original

    사용자 만족도 100%

  • After 1 use, makeup adhesion improvement 184%
    Korean original

    1회 사용 후 메이크업 밀착력 개선 184%

  • All skin types
    Korean original

    모든 피부 타입

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.