sidmool
sidmool Greentea Pureskin Peeling Gel
Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read
Read on 2026-09-12
What is this product?
A 120 mL gommage peeling gel that exfoliates by friction rather than chemistry. Nineteen ingredients, and the working one is cellulose at position four, which clumps under a massage and carries loosened surface cells off with it. There is no AHA, no BHA, no PHA, no enzyme and no grain abrasive anywhere on the list, so nothing here dissolves or scrubs. Jeju green tea water is second at a disclosed 10 percent, which is the only concentration figure printed on this label. Nine of the nineteen entries are humectants or soothing agents, against one working abrasive. Lavender essential oil sits last and is the one likely sensitiser. No pH and no test data are published, and the product carries no functional cosmetic filing.
What makes it different?
Two things separate it on its shelf. It is an exfoliant with no exfoliating acid and no abrasive grain, which makes the mechanism entirely mechanical and entirely dependent on how hard the user rubs. And the brand publishes a concentration for its headline botanical, 10 percent Jeju green tea water at position two, alongside its origin, which is more than the label needed to disclose.
What is in it?
The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.
Key ingredient
- Water
- Camellia Sinensis Leaf Water
- Glycerin
- Cellulose
- Butylene Glycol
- Sodium Hyaluronate
- Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate
- Cetyl Ethylhexanoate
- Betaine
- Beta-Glucan
- Arginine
- Anthemis Nobilis Flower Extract
- Allantoin
- Sodium Polyglutamate
- Carbomer
- 1,2-Hexanediol
- Caprylyl Glycol
- Sodium Hydroxide
- Lavandula Angustifolia (Lavender) Oil
Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.
We could not place these in the list above: 라벤더오일, 세틸에틸헥사노에이트
Did the ad claims hold up?
We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them holds up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.
backed by evidence1
- 제주의 녹차를 담은 건강한 각질 관리
likely, not proven2
- 녹차 필링 젤은 부드러운 마사지를 통해서 내추럴 셀룰로오스가 뭉치면서 피부에 각질을 관리해주고 제주의 녹차수로 피부 보습과 함께 영양을 공급해 주는데 도움을 주는 고마주 타입의 필링젤
- 제주녹차를 담은 순하고 속시원한 필링젤
Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.
What else is worth seeing?
Products we read alongside this one.