celimax

celimax Ji Woo Gae Cica BHA Blemish Toner Pad

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of celimax Ji Woo Gae Cica BHA Blemish Toner Pad

Read on 2026-09-14

What is this product?

A Korean wipe off pad from celimax, sold as 170ml holding 60 sheets and also sold as a refill of the same size. The disclosed list is water led and carries three acids: salicylic acid declared at 0.45%, lactobionic acid, and a trace of capryloyl salicylic acid at the very end. Denatured alcohol sits third, which is high, and tea tree leaf oil sits in the middle. Despite the cica name, the centella extract is declared at 0.02% and madecassoside at 0.001%, both token quantities, while bifida ferment lysate sits thirteenth. The practical character is a genuine acid wipe with a fast bare finish rather than the calming pad its name suggests. No fragrance is declared. No INCI list and no pH figure were published on the surfaces read.

What makes it different?

Two things separate it. It declares a real beta hydroxy acid figure, 0.45% salicylic acid, and stacks a poly hydroxy acid and a trace lipo hydroxy acid behind it, which is an unusually layered acid set for a pad sold on calming. And the gap between its name and its list is unusually wide in the measurable direction: the cica materials it is named for are disclosed at 0.02% and 0.001%, while the volatile alcohol nobody mentions sits third.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 7 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: Melaleuca Alternifolia Leaf Oil, Salicylic Acid, Capryloyl Salicylic Acid

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 2 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them holds up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

backed by evidence1

  • 셀리맥스 지우개 시카 바하 블레미쉬 토너 패드

no evidence1

  • 민감피부 자극 테스트를 통해 저자극 제품임을 확인했습니다.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.