PibooAll postsIngredients
Englishko

Cellology

Cellology Blue Eraser Cream

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-07

What is this product?

Pick this if the concern is dark marks left after breakouts and a fragrance blend is acceptable: niacinamide sits sixth of 41 entries, which is the best-evidenced topical for that specific problem, alongside madecassoside, allantoin and centella callus vesicles. Two things to know before buying. Titanium dioxide at twenty-four is a white pigment, so some of the erasing effect is optical and immediate rather than a change in the mark, and the statement declares 향료 outright, which is unusual in a category aimed at skin recovering from acne. Nine recombinant peptides fill the last nine slots, where a functional level cannot be inferred. No concentration, no pH and no English INCI list were found, and the goods record's own quantity field says 15ml while every product name says 50ml.

What makes it different?

Two features separate it from the mark-fading shelf. The last nine of its 41 entries are recombinant human peptides (sh-oligopeptides and sh-polypeptides, the growth factor class), which is a much longer peptide tail than this price band usually carries and also the part of the list where levels are least inferable. And it is one of the few products aimed at post-acne marks that contains a white pigment, which means part of what a user sees on day one is coverage rather than correction. The formula carries no hyaluronate and no ceramide at all, so it is a treatment cream rather than a barrier one.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 메도우폼씨오일

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up on their own. They are partly right at best.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

partly backed1

  • Improvement of pigmented acne marks and skin texture
    Korean original

    착색된 여드름 흔적과 피부 결 개선

overstated ad line1

  • Blue Eraser
    Korean original

    블루 이레이저

no evidence1

  • It is a medical brand that professionally cares for skin concerns based on academic data and clinical trials.
    Korean original

    학술자료와 임상시험을 기반으로 피부 고민을 전문적으로 케어 해주는 메디컬 브랜드 입니다.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.