REJUDEX

REJUDEX Derma Repairing Solution Ampoule

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Read on 2026-09-07

What is this product?

The number on the front of this one cannot be checked: the listing sells it on c-PDRN at 10,000 ppm, but the ingredient list prints no ppm or percentage against anything, and no entry is named PDRN at all, the nearest being hydrolyzed DNA at ninth of 25. Pharma Research is the parent and c-PDRN is its patented material, so the pedigree is real even though the dose is never shown. What can be verified is the mark work: niacinamide sixth and tranexamic acid twelfth, in a plain aqueous formula with no fragrance, no alcohol, no oil phase and no exfoliating acid, which is a sensible shape for skin just after a procedure. Two entries do carry 애씨드 in their names, tranexamic acid at 12 and hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid at 18, and neither is an exfoliant.

What makes it different?

This is an aftercare ampoule sold as two 10mL units, and the formula reads like one: 25 ingredients with no fragrance, no essential oil, no drying alcohol, no exfoliating acid and no oil phase whatsoever. The humectant range is unusually varied for so short a list, with hydroxyethyl urea at 11, polyquaternium-51 at 17, hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid at 18 and beta glucan at 23 all binding water by different mechanisms. sh-Oligopeptide-1, the EGF the brand line advertises, comes dead last at 25 with no amount attached. Hinoki leaf extract at 20 is the only botanical in the formula, and the cica the brand's launch coverage mentions belongs to other products in the line, not to this one.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.

Key ingredient

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 2 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up on their own. They are partly right at best.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

partly backed1

  • Mark Repair
    Korean original

    흔적 리페어

no evidence1

  • c-PDRN 10,000 PPM

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines