NEER'G
NEER'G Acnic Spot Patch
Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read
Read on 2026-09-14
What is this product?
A hydrocolloid-style acne spot patch from NEER'G, sold as 58 sheets in two diameters (8mm and 10mm) across two carrier sheets, individually sachet-packed inside a zip pouch. The seven-entry ingredient statement splits cleanly into an adhesive and absorbent base (polyisobutene, cellulose gum, water, butylene glycol) and three actives at undisclosed levels: colloidal sulfur, hesperidin and succinic acid. There is no salicylic acid, and the brand states it holds no functional-cosmetic filing. The page cites a four-week human application study on twenty subjects at a named clinical testing centre, reporting improvements in inflamed lesions, non-inflamed lesions, calming and pore appearance, but links no report and never defines its control group. No pH, no English INCI list and no disclosed concentrations were found on the surfaces checked.
What makes it different?
Two things separate it. First, the active axis: colloidal sulfur leading a three-active set, in a format where salicylic acid is the more usual choice, which makes it a route for someone who wants a keratolytic spot patch without a BHA. Second, an unusually explicit self-limitation: the brand prints its own footnote restricting the sebum, dead-skin and bacteria assertions to raw-material properties, and separately discloses that it holds no functional-cosmetic filing.
What is in it?
The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.
This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary.
Key ingredient
- Polyisobutene
- Cellulose Gum
- Water
- Butylene Glycol
- Colloidal Sulfur
- Hesperidin
- Succinic Acid
Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.
Did the ad claims hold up?
We checked 13 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 3 of them hold up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.
backed by evidence3
- * 상기 내용은 원료적 특성에 한함
- 기능성 화장품 심사(보고) 필 유무 : 해당사항 없움
- 지퍼 파우치 안에 개별 포장하여 오염 걱정 없이 안심하고 사용하세요.
likely, not proven2
- 여드름성 피부 사용 적합
- 짜기 전 진정효과
partly backed5
- 3가지 성분의 시너지 효과로 3 DOWN
- 염증성 병변 26.57% 개선
- 비 염증성 병변 11.96% 개선
- 트러블로 인한 손상된 피부 진정 10.26% 개선
- 초밀착트러블피부고민부위무광방수 스팟패치
overstated ad line1
- 자극 받은 모공까지 케어 피부 모공 20% 개선
no evidence1
- 2025 상반기 신제품 어워드
says nothing1
- 제품주요사양: 모든 피부 타입
Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.
What else is worth seeing?
Products we read alongside this one.