Ariul

Ariul Stress Relieving Purefull Cleansing Tissue

Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read

Product photo of Ariul Stress Relieving Purefull Cleansing Tissue

Read on 2026-09-12

What is this product?

Buy this Ariul wipe if you want a pleasant-smelling, effective face wipe for days when rinsing is inconvenient; be careful if you react to citrus essential oils, because the list ends with six of them and the allergen declaration does not reconcile across surfaces. The cleansing system is three PEG surfactants plus a plant oil and a quaternary antiseptic, which is competent for makeup, and it is water-based so it leaves no oily film. Two disclosure problems are worth knowing before buying. The brand publishes no statutory block on its own store at all, so the ingredient list had to be read from a detail image, and that image is shared with the 15-sheet version, so it cannot confirm which sheet count it belongs to. And a retail listing for the same product declares citral, limonene and linalool while the brand's own list does not. The marketing claims, 스피드 멜팅시스템 and 미세먼지 세정 능력 검증, are a coined term that is never defined and a verification that is never described.

What makes it different?

A wipe whose best-reported feature and its least reliable disclosure are the same thing: six essential oils give it the scent that leads its review topics, while a retail surface for the same product declares three fragrance allergens the brand's own list omits. Its ingredient list exists only inside a detail image, and that image is shared with a different sheet count, so the disclosure cannot be pinned to one pack size.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

This brand publishes its ingredient list in Korean only. Names below are the matching INCI names from the Korean Cosmetic Association ingredient dictionary, except 2 with no dictionary entry, left in Korean.

Key ingredient

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

We could not place these in the list above: 유칼립투스잎오일, 라임전초오일, 구주소나무잎오일, 오렌지껍질오일, 베르가모트오일, 레몬껍질오일

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. None of them hold up on their own. They are partly right at best.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

partly backed1

  • Refreshing cleansing tissue with naturally derived fragrance
    Korean original

    자연 유래 향으로 상쾌한 클렌징 티슈

no evidence2

  • Fine dust removal with speed melting system
    Korean original

    스피드 멜팅시스템으로 미세먼지 제거

  • Fine dust cleansing ability verified, best seller cleansing tissue
    Korean original

    미세먼지 세정 능력 검증, 베스트 셀러 클렌징 티슈

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.