sidmool ULTRA FACIAL HYALURONIC ACID TONER

What is this product?

A 300ml sidmool toner with a fifteen item ingredient list and nothing in it that is not a humectant, a preservative-adjacent polyol, or one of two soothing extracts. Seven of the fifteen entries are hyaluronans, at positions 5 to 11, and one of them is disclosed inline as 3,000ppm, which converts to 0.3% and is attached to a named entry at a known position rather than floating in marketing copy. There is no oil, no wax, no ester, no fatty alcohol, no gum and no film former, so this is a water layer and nothing else: it binds water well and supplies nothing to hold that water in, which makes what goes over it the deciding factor. The one claim with nothing behind it is 5나노, a particle size figure with no molecular weight or sizing method anywhere in the files held. Also unpublished: any test, any pH, any application method.

What makes it different?

Brevity plus one real number. Fifteen entries is a short list for a toner, seven of them are distinct hyaluronans, and the brand prints 3,000ppm inside the ingredient list itself rather than in a marketing line, which is the more accountable place to put a figure. The formula carries no lipid, no gum and no film former at all, which makes it a pure water step: strong on binding water, silent on keeping it.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

Key ingredient

• Water
• Glycerin
• Butylene Glycol
• 1,2-Hexanediol
• Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid
• Sodium Hyaluronate
• Hyaluronic Acid
• Sodium Hyaluronate Crosspolymer
• Sodium Acetylated Hyaluronate
• Potassium Hyaluronate
• Hydrolyzed Sodium Hyaluronate
• Polyglutamic Acid
• Allantoin
• Scutellaria Baicalensis Root Extract
• Malachite Extract

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them looks likely, though none are proven outright.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines

What else is worth seeing?

Products we read alongside this one.

• sidmool ULTRA FACIAL MOISTURIZING MILD LOTIONAnother product in the same category
• sidmool Ectoin Cica Essence TonerAnother product in the same category