sidmool Original Well-being Green Tea Skin

What is this product?

Sidmool's Original Well-being Green Tea Skin is a budget-tier, oil-free hydrating toner built around Jeju-grown green tea water and extract, both disclosed at 5 percent and 0.5 percent respectively, alongside EGCG, sodium hyaluronate, polyglutamic acid and centella extract. It carries no fragrance ingredient beyond one declared lavender essential oil, no exfoliating acid and no drying alcohol, so it reads as gentle and layering-friendly rather than as an active-forward product. Its own product page states no reviews are yet registered on it. Concentrations for most actives beyond the two headline green tea materials are undisclosed, and pH and container form are not stated on any archived surface.

What makes it different?

Two disclosed green tea concentrations (5 percent water, 0.5 percent extract) on a single label is unusually specific for a budget-tier toner in this category, where most competitors name the ingredient without a number. The formula's complete absence of an oil phase, paired with a real humectant trio (sodium hyaluronate, polyglutamic acid, green tea water), positions it as a light layering base rather than as a standalone hydrating step.

What is in it?

The full ingredient list as the brand publishes it, in the printed order. Each name links to what we know about that ingredient.

Key ingredientWorth a closer look

• Water
• Glycerin
• Camellia Sinensis Leaf Water
• Butylene Glycol
• 1,2-Hexanediol
• Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice
• Epigallocatechin Gallate
• Sodium Hyaluronate
• Polyglutamic Acid
• Allantoin
• Tocopheryl Acetate
• Hydrolyzed Collagen
• Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
• Rosmarinus Officinalis (Rosemary) Leaf Extract
• Centella Asiatica Extract
• Chamomilla Recutita (Matricaria) Flower Extract
• Scutellaria Baicalensis Root Extract
• Polygonum Cuspidatum Root Extract
• Polysorbate 20
• Lavandula Angustifolia (Lavender) Oil
• Carbomer
• Arginine

Ingredients with no mark are ones we found nothing notable about, and when marks overlap on one ingredient we show the caution first.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 4 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them holds up. The rest are only partly right or have nothing behind them.

Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines