Centellian24
Centellian24 Madeca Mela Capture Ampoule Max
Ingredient analysis and how the ad lines read
Read on 2026-09-06
What is this product?
Centellian24's Madeca Mela Capture Ampoule Max in the 15ml two piece pack is sold for melasma and dark spots, and what is in it is readable but not confirmed as this pack's. Centellian24 publishes no ingredient list for this pack on its own pages; a third party page archived for it does print one, and the repository index holds a separate string that is shared byte for byte with the brand's larger 45ml Expert version of almost the same name. Each of the two keys carries its own goods number and its own title, so what leaves the attribution open is not a missing identifier but the fact that one identical ingredient string sits against both. Neither is adopted, because neither is pinned to this 15ml pack rather than to the 45ml, so the ingredient fields stay null on unresolved attribution rather than on absent evidence. 맥스 is not just label filler here: a third party curation table names it the largest and most recent of three generations (Rx 7ml, Pro 10ml, Max 15ml) with the strongest reported effect claims, though those figures come from a blog rather than a brand primary source. Anyone screening for fragrance or for actives to avoid during pregnancy should read the archived evidence as live rather than absent: the third party page prints 향료, the declared allergen 시트로넬올, six essential oils and 레티닐팔미테이트, and separately advises a patch test for sensitive skin on the grounds that the formula contains essential oils. Because that page is not confirmed to describe this 15ml pack, the finding is a reason to check the pack in hand, not a clearance and not a settled fact about this SKU.
What makes it different?
What separates this from its shelf neighbours is a naming problem rather than a formulation one. It sits one token away from a larger Centellian24 ampoule of nearly the same name, and the ingredient string the repository index holds against this id is shared with that 45ml key, which is where it was adopted. A separate ingredient paragraph is printed by the third party page archived for this product, and its own spelling variants show it to be an independent transcription rather than a copy of the index string. Neither is attributed to this 15ml pack, so neither is used here to tell the two products apart. The pack format is the one thing that clearly is its own: 15ml in two pieces, which suits trying the line or carrying it, rather than a course of daily use. For a reader who wants the same product story with a readable label, the 45ml Expert version prints its full ingredient list.
Did the ad claims hold up?
We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. 2 of them look likely, though none are proven outright.
Claims translated from Korean, originals preserved.
likely, not proven2
- [Melasma Spot Ampoule]
Korean original
[기미잡티앰플]
- Max
Korean original
맥스
no evidence1
- Mela Capture
Korean original
멜라 캡처
Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.
What else is worth seeing?
Products we read alongside this one.