beplain Mung Bean Weak Acid Cleansing Water Tissue

What is this product?

A 20-sheet acidic cleansing water tissue, and the honest headline is that its ingredient list could not be established. Two ingredient panels circulate for the same selling unit, the 20-sheet single: an Olive Young record with 21 entries led by 정제수 and 녹두추출물, and a Kurly record with 26 entries in which 녹두추출물 falls to ninth and which adds five ingredients including 페녹시에탄올. Both are retail surfaces, neither is first-party, and no brand surface exists to break the tie, so facts.ingredients_ko is null rather than guessed. What both readings agree on: the only surfactants are two non-ionic polyglyceryl esters, there is a citrate buffer pair consistent with the 약산성 positioning, there is no fragrance and no alcohol, and the same six botanical extracts appear in both. What they disagree on is material, since the position of 녹두추출물, the product's headline ingredient, moves from second to ninth, and label order is a contents ordering. The brand's own storefront never served this product across three collection rounds, and two full category listings that were retrieved do not contain it.

What makes it different?

This record's distinguishing feature is evidential rather than compositional, and it is worth stating plainly because it changes what the record is for. This record does not answer what is in the product; it establishes that the question is open, and shows the work behind that conclusion. Two retail panels describe the same 20-sheet selling unit and cannot both be right: they differ by five ingredients, they disagree on whether 페녹시에탄올 is present at all, and they place the headline mung bean extract at second and at ninth respectively. Ordinarily a generation difference would explain that, and the check was run: a negative sweep of renewal vocabulary across both retail surfaces and the corpus record returns nothing, so neither surface announces itself as newer. Ordinarily a first-party surface would break the tie, and there is none reachable. So the useful thing a reader can take from this product is the intersection rather than the list: a non-ionic polyglyceryl cleansing system with a citrate buffer, no fragrance, no alcohol and no exfoliating acid, wrapped in a no-rinse tissue format with a resealable lid. Anyone who needs to know whether this product contains phenoxyethanol should treat that as unanswered here.

Did the ad claims hold up?

We checked 3 lines this product advertises against the ingredient list and public documents. One of them looks likely, though none are proven outright.

Each line is quoted as the brand published it, and each one was read on its own against the ingredient list and the documents the brand publishes.

How we read these lines